Supporting drug-free rehabilitation and education
Celebrating the end result of effective drug and alcohol
rehabilitation
Each year some of our tax
dollars go toward getting an assessment of the drug and alcohol problems in the
United States. This National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) is overseen
by the Department of Health and Human Services, and the release of its findings
has fallen in September of each year. September also marks
National Alcohol and Drug
Addiction Recovery Month, which is now in its 18th annual
observance.
This year's theme, "Join the Voices for Recovery: Saving
Lives, Saving Dollars," aims to raise awareness about the financial and human
costs of substance abuse and highlights the benefits that investing in
treatment can have on those who enter recovery, their families and the larger
community.
The drug rehab and alcohol addiction treatment field is
comprised of thousands of outpatient and residential programs across the
country. There is a chunk of public funds that is spent on substance abuse
treatment and prevention, but not enough. Even more importantly though, is that
the dollars that are spent often go to ineffective treatment
methods.
Most treatment programs in the country are centered on the 12
steps, which came from Alcoholics Anonymous. The problem is that the original
text didn't talk about being "in recovery" for the rest of your life. In fact,
author Bill W. said he had recovered from alcoholism. Some may say this is
merely semantics, but let's look at the literal and implied meanings of those
words.
According to Webster's online dictionary, "recover" means to bring back to
a normal position or condition; and "recovery" means the process of combating a
disorder or a real or perceived problem.
The difference is in the
process or tense of it. Someone "in recovery" is given the idea that they must
continue to fight because they're not yet there. Someone who is considered
"recovered" has won - they've moved on with life and drugs or alcohol are no
longer a problem.
Our tax dollars should be given to programs that focus
on the product instead of the process. The product is a person no longer
affected by drug or alcohol use and who has recovered from their addiction. By
spending money on programs that expect relapse and write addiction off as an
improvable "disease" that one is always in recovery from, then we're only
throwing dollars at the process with no end result in sight.
This
inverted theory has gotten so out of hand that the misinformed few have tried
to change the name of one of our governmental agencies, from the National
Institute on Drug Abuse to the National Institute on Diseases of Addiction, in
an effort to further distort the process on the road to eventually making it
all but impossible to recover.
Effective rehabilitation programs are
ones that focus on getting people fully recovered, such as those supported by
The New Face of
Recovery. The rest are just temporary treatment centers, whether they're
based on the 12 steps or not. Any program that can demonstrate the ability to
get people off of drugs and make them productive members of society again at a
high ratio should be given a lot of credit, because they embody the true
meaning of Recovery Month.
© 2011 Drug-Free Alliance